Processing math: 25%

Friday, July 13, 2012

Circle Diffeomorphisms I

This is the first of a series of posts based on these lecture notes on KAM theory. For now I just want to outline section 2, which is a toy model of KAM thoery.

Circle Diffeomorphisms


We consider a map ϕ:RR defined by
ϕ(x)=x+ρ+η(x)
where ρ is its rotation number and η(x) is "small".

Define Sσ to be the strip {|Imz|<σ}C and let Bσ be the space of holomorphic functions bounded on Sσ with sup norm .

Goal: Show that if \|\eta\|_\sigma is sufficiently small, then there exists some diffeomorphism H(x) such that
H^{-1} \circ \phi \circ H (x) = x + \rho
i.e. that \phi is conjugate to a pure rotation.


Linearization


The idea is that if \eta is small, then H should be close to the identity, so we suppose that
H(x) = x + h(x)
where h(x) is small. Plugging this into the equation above and discarding higher order terms yields
h(x+\rho) - h(x) = \eta(x)
Since \eta is periodic, we Fourier transform both sides to obtain an explicit formula for the Fourier coefficients of h(x). We have to show several things:

1. The Fourier series defining h(x) converges in some appropriate sense.

2. The function H(x) = x + h(x) is a diffeomorphism.

3. The composition \tilde{\phi} = H^{-1} \circ \phi \circ H is closer to a pure rotation than \phi, in the sense that
\tilde{\phi}(x) = x + \rho + \tilde{\eta}(x)
where \|\tilde{\eta}\| \ll \|\eta\|.


Newton's Method

Carrying out the analysis, one finds that for appropriate epsilons and deltas, if \eta \in B_\sigma then H \in B_{\sigma - \delta} and that \|\tilde{\eta}\|_{\sigma-\delta} \leq C \|\eta\|_\sigma^2. By carefully choosing the deltas, we can iterate this procedure (composing the H's) to obtain a well-defined limit H_\infty \in B_{\sigma/2} such that
H_\infty^{-1} \circ \phi \circ H_\infty (x) = x + \rho,
as desired.

So in fact the idea of the proof is extremely simple, and all of the hard work is in proving some estimates.

No comments: