Processing math: 100%

Monday, January 16, 2012

Path Integrals 1: Feynman's Derivation

Consider the Hilbert space H=L2(R) with Lebesgue measure and a Hamiltonian H=T(k)+V(x) (a sum of kinetic and potential energy). Then the quantum hamiltonian ˆH acts as
(ˆHψ)(y)=12πeik(yx)T(k)ψ(x)dxdk+V(y)ψ(y)=12πeik(yx)H(k,x)ψ(x)dxdk

Now consider the Schrodinger equation
ψt=iˆHψ.

We would like to obtain a formula for the solution operator Ut=eiˆHt. Let us consider its Schwartz kernel y|Ut|x. Let N be a large integer so that Δt=t/N is "small". Then we can write
Ut=UNΔt,
Now consider a single term:
y|UΔt|xy|1iΔtˆH|x=δ(yx)iΔtx|ˆH|y=12πeik(yx)(1iΔtH(k,x))dk12πeik(yx)iΔtH(k,x)dk
Now we have (taking x0=x and xN=y)
y|Ut|x=dx1dxN1 ×xN|UΔt|xN1x1|UΔt|x0=1(2π)Ndx1dxN1dk0dkN1 × eikN(xNxN1)iΔtH(kN1,xN1)eikN(x1x0)iΔtH(k0,x0)=1(2π)Ndx1dxN1dk0dkN1 × expN1j=0ikj(xj+1xj)iΔtH(kj,xj)
Note this kind of integral seems like it should have a natural interpretation in symplectic or contact geometry, since the expression dxdk/(2π)N is very nealy the Liouville measure. This is the most general form of the path integral.

Now assume that H(k,x)=k2/2m+V(x). Then the k-dependent terms have the form
eik(yx)iΔtk2/2m.
Complete the square
ik(yx)iΔtk2/2m=iΔt2m(k22mΔtk(yx))=iΔt2m(k22mΔtk(yx)+m2Δt2(yx)2m2Δt2(yx)2)=iΔt2m(kmΔt(yx))2+im2Δt(yx)2
Now, using that
eak2=πa
We have
eiΔt2m(kmΔt(yx))2=2πmiΔt
Putting it altogether, we get the more familiar version of the path integral,
y|Ut|xCNdx1dxN1 × expiN1j=0m2Δt(xj+1xj)2V(xj)Δt
where
C=12π2πmiΔt=m2πiΔt

No comments: