Conformal Invariance in 2D
To begin, recall that in two dimensions, the conformal transformations are generated by holomorphic and anti-holomorphic transformations. At the infinitesimal level, let ℓn:=−zn+1∂z be a basis of holomorphic vector fields. These satisfy the Witt algebra[ℓm,ℓn]=(m−n)ℓm+n.
Similarly, we can define ˉℓm=−ˉzn+1∂ˉz, and in addition to the Witt algebra these new generators satisfy [ˉℓm,ℓn]=0.
Now, we could try to define a 2D conformal quantum field theory to be a unitary representation of the Witt algebra (or rather, of two copies of the Witt algebra, since we have both holomorphic and anti-holomorphic vector fields--but nevermind that). But this is too naive.
Central Extensions
Recall that in quantum mechanics, states are represented by vectors in some Hilbert space H. However, the state |ϕ⟩ and α|ϕ⟩ are physically equivalent for any non-zero complex number α. The reason, of course, is that the expectation value of an operator O is defined to be ⟨ϕ|O|ϕ⟩/⟨ϕ|ϕ⟩, and such expressions are invariant under rescaling in H.Thus, a symmetry group G for a theory does not necessarily act via a map G→U(H). It suffices to have a projective representation G→PU(H). Let g,pu be the Lie algebras of G and PU, respectively. A projective representation gives a map
g→pu.
Since PU is a quotient of U, we have a short exact sequence
0→C→u→pu→0.
Now let ˆg be defined as
ˆg={(ξ,η)∈u⊕g | π(ξ)=ρ(η)}
This comes with a natural projection ˆg→g. If we suppose that the projective representation ρ is faithful, then the kernel of this map is exactly C. Hence, a faithful projective representation of g yields a short exact sequence of Lie algebras
0→C→ˆg→g→0.
We have obtained a central extension of g.
Virasoro Algebra
Finally, we can define the Virasoro algebra. It has generators Ln and c, with defining relations[Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+c12(m3−m)δm+n,0,[c,Ln]=0.
The generator c acts as a scalar in any irreducible representation, and its value is called the central charge. The factor of 1/12 is entirely conventional. Now, the amazing fact is the following.
Theorem. Up to equivalence, the Virasoro algebra is the unique non-trivial central extension of the Witt algebra.
Proof sketch. This is essentially just a calculation. Any central extension has to be of the form
[Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+A(m,n)c
for some function A(m,n). If we make the replacement Lm↦Lm+amc, then we have
[Lm,Ln]=(m−n)Lm+n+(A(m,n)+(m−n)am+n)c
Taking n=0, we have
[Lm,L0]=mLm+(A(m,0)+mam)c
Hence for m≠0 we can take am=m−1A(m,0). Having done this, we are now free to assume that A(m,0)=0 for all m. Then we may apply the Jacobi identity to deduce that A(m,n)=0 except possibly for m=−n, so that A(m,n) can be written in the form A(m,n)=Amδm+n,0. Finally, another application of the Jacobi identity yields a simple recurrence relation for the coefficients Am, and it is easily seen that every solution of this recurrence is proportional to m3−m.
Now we can take our (preliminary, and still too naive) definition of a quantum conformal field theory to be a unitary representation of the Virasoro algebra.
Stress-Energy Tensor and OPE
The operator L0 behaves like the Hamiltonian of the theory, and the Virasoro relations show that Ln for n>0 act as lowering operators. Hence, in a physically sensible representation, the vacuum vector |Ω⟩ will be annihilated by Ln for all n>0. Unitary requires L†n=L−n, so additionally we have ⟨Ω|Ln=0 for n<0. Hence
⟨Ω|LmLn|Ω⟩=0 unless n≤0,m≥0
Now define the stress-energy tensor to be the operator-valued formal power series
T(z)=∑nLnzn+2We can consider the vacuum expectation of the product T(z)T(w). By the above remarks, many terms in the expansion will vanish. In fact, it is a straightforward (but tedious!) exercise to check the following.
Theorem. The stress-energy tensor satisfies the operator product expansion
T(z)T(w)∼c/2(z−w)4+2T(w)(z−w)2+∂wT(w)z−w
where ∼ denotes that the left- and right-hand sides are equal up to the addition of terms with vanishing vev and/or regular as z→w.